California sues Coca-Cola, Nestlé over addictive ultra-processed foods

California sues Coca-Cola, Nestlé over addictive ultra-processed foods

A display of strawberries, oranges, and cabbage with the text "Food Safety Modernization Act (FSMA)" on the right side.

California sues Coca-Cola, Nestlé over addictive ultra-processed foods

California has taken legal action against major food manufacturers over ultra-processed foods (UPFs). The lawsuit targets brands like Coca-Cola, Kellogg's, and Nestlé, accusing them of misleading advertising and addictive product designs. San Francisco is the first city to join the case, seeking financial compensation from local governments treating UPF-related illnesses.

The state's legal challenge follows a 2023 law defining UPFs and banning them from public schools. Officials argue that these products contain harmful chemicals and are falsely marketed as safe. A recent study linked high UPF consumption to a greater risk of chronic diseases, reinforcing the lawsuit's claims.

The case also aims to push for clearer, science-backed food labelling. Nurse practitioner Rebecca Donahue has long advised patients to cut down on added sugars and avoid heavily processed items found in supermarket centre aisles. Meanwhile, the Consumer Brands Association has criticised the lawsuit, questioning the definition of UPFs and promoting industry efforts to offer healthier alternatives. So far, no other U.S. state has passed laws mirroring California's 2023 UPF restrictions. However, New York and Massachusetts have proposed similar bills, and a few cities have launched voluntary reduction programmes.

If successful, the lawsuit could force manufacturers to reformulate products or change marketing practices. It may also set a precedent for other states considering UPF regulations. For now, California remains the only state with a legal definition of ultra-processed foods.

Neueste Nachrichten