Hidden Risks of Sugar-Free Sweets Exposed in New Consumer Report

Hidden Risks of Sugar-Free Sweets Exposed in New Consumer Report

A piece of candy coated with sugar.

Hidden Risks of Sugar-Free Sweets Exposed in New Consumer Report

Sugar-free sweets often come with hidden drawbacks despite their health appeal. A recent report by the Consumer Center Hamburg highlights concerns over their high cost and potential side effects. Many products contain sugar substitutes that can cause digestive issues, even in small amounts. The Consumer Center Hamburg tested 16 sugar alcohol-sweetened products and found all exceeded the 10% threshold requiring a laxative warning. The highest concentration—97%—was in Tictac Two Fresh & Mild Spearmint Flavor Mint Candies, which are almost entirely made of sorbitol. Consuming just 10 grams of maltitol or sorbitol per serving can trigger diarrhoea in sensitive individuals.

Sugar substitutes like sorbitol and maltitol have been used for years, but their risks are often overlooked. These alternatives can also be addictive, much like refined sugar, which has long served as a cheap filler and preservative in processed foods. In 2012, the Federal Council banned the label *‘Suitable for Diabetics’* for products lacking scientific backing. Price is another issue. Sugar-free chocolate bars can cost around 50 euros per kilogram, while gummy bears sometimes double the price of their sugary counterparts. Experts argue that cutting sugar intake directly is more effective than relying on substitutes.

The report underscores the need for clearer warnings on sugar-free products. High levels of sugar alcohols can significantly affect well-being, particularly for those with sensitivities. Consumers are advised to check labels and consider gradual sugar reduction instead of switching to substitutes.

Neueste Nachrichten